If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in IN. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
1024Sprague and Jackson was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the IN Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on May 26, 2026. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is September 22, 2025.
From the AG filing description
1024Sprague and Jackson operates as a boutique professional services and legal consulting firm, specializing in complex corporate litigation, asset management, and comprehensive estate planning. Because of the nature of its practice, the firm acts as a central repository for vast amounts of highly confidential information, routinely handling sensitive client records, proprietary corporate strategies, intricate financial ledgers, and comprehensive background documentation required for high-stakes legal proceedings. This concentration of high-value data makes the firm a prime target for malicious cyber actors seeking to exploit confidential files for illicit financial gain, corporate espionage, or identity exploitation. The 2026 data breach reported to the Indiana Attorney General indicates a significant failure in network perimeter defense, likely involving unauthorized external access to the firm's centralized document management systems or a compromised third-party vendor portal. In the legal and professional services sector, such incidents frequently stem from sophisticated credential-harvesting operations, spear-phishing campaigns targeting administrative personnel, or unpatched vulnerabilities within legacy file-transfer protocols. When threat actors breach legal infrastructure, they typically gain unfettered access to internal archives containing years of privileged communications, sensitive client portfolios, and administrative records. The exposure resulting from the 1024Sprague and Jackson incident compromises a devastating array of sensitive information, including full legal names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, banking and trust account details, and confidential legal or financial dossiers. The compromise of this specific data exposes victims to severe, long-term risks, including targeted identity theft, fraudulent credit applications, unauthorized wire transfers, and the potential exposure of private litigation or corporate strategies. Unlike routine retail breaches, a compromise at a legal and financial advisory firm strikes at the core of an individual's personal and economic security, leaving victims vulnerable to multifaceted financial fraud that can take years to detect and resolve. As a custodian of sensitive client and corporate data, 1024Sprague and Jackson was legally bound by state consumer protection statutes, common-law duties of confidentiality, and federal guidelines such as the FTC Act to implement robust administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. These obligations require multi-factor authentication, rigorous network monitoring, regular penetration testing, and strict access controls to protect confidential files against unauthorized exfiltration. The occurrence of a widespread data breach strongly suggests that the firm failed to meet these baseline security standards, allowing unauthorized intruders to bypass defensive layers that should have been hardened against intrusion. Receiving a formal data breach notification letter from 1024Sprague and Jackson serves as official confirmation that your sensitive personal and financial data was compromised due to inadequate corporate security. Under modern legal standards, this notification establishes the legal standing necessary to participate in a class action lawsuit aimed at holding the firm accountable for its negligence. Affected individuals do not need to demonstrate actual financial loss or identity theft to seek justice; the increased risk of future harm and the loss of privacy are actionable injuries. Our firm evaluates these cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing out of pocket, and we recover fees only if we successfully secure a recovery on your behalf.
Under the Indiana data breach notification law, you may have a legal claim against 1024Sprague and Jackson if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Phone numbers exposed in breaches are used for SIM swapping attacks — hijacking your number to bypass two-factor authentication on financial accounts.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Indiana data breach notification law and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from 1024Sprague and Jackson does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by 1024Sprague and Jackson during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Indiana data breach notification law, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
1024Sprague and Jackson breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win