IN · AG Filing: Jul 28, 2026 · Recently disclosed — legal window is open
No cost. No obligation. If your data was exposed by 166Buechel Stone, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
Start Free Review →Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Phone numbers exposed in breaches are used for SIM swapping attacks — hijacking your number to bypass two-factor authentication on financial accounts.
166Buechel Stone was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the IN Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on July 28, 2026. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is April 8, 2026.
From the AG filing description
166Buechel Stone operates within the specialized heavy manufacturing, quarrying, and architectural stone distribution sector, serving residential and commercial builders, masonry contractors, and architectural design firms across the Midwest and beyond. Because of the complex operational nature of heavy industry and building supply chains, the company maintains extensive digital archives containing sensitive personnel files, corporate financial records, vendor contracts, proprietary operational blueprints, and detailed customer transaction data. Managing a workforce of quarry operators, administrative staff, logistics coordinators, and sales representatives requires the collection and continuous retention of deeply confidential personal identifiable information, making the organization a high-value repository for cybercriminals seeking lucrative targets for exploitation. In 2026, 166Buechel Stone officially reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the Indiana Attorney General, triggering mandatory breach notifications to affected individuals and state regulatory bodies. While exhaustive forensic investigations into industrial and supply chain cyber attacks frequently point toward sophisticated ransomware deployments, credential harvesting campaigns, or unauthorized intrusions into corporate network infrastructure, breaches of this magnitude typically expose systemic vulnerabilities in legacy enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems or vendor access points. Unauthorized actors frequently target manufacturing and supply chain networks under the assumption that operational continuity takes precedence over robust baseline network segmentation, allowing intruders to bypass perimeter defenses and dwell undetected within internal systems for extended periods. The compromised datasets resulting from the 166Buechel Stone security incident are anticipated to encompass a dangerous combination of sensitive personal details, including full legal names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, banking and direct deposit information, home addresses, and confidential employment records. The exposure of Social Security numbers and banking details creates an immediate and severe risk of identity theft, unauthorized credit openings, and fraudulent tax filings, while compromised direct deposit and wage information leaves victims uniquely vulnerable to account takeover scams and unauthorized electronic fund transfers. In the context of industrial data breaches, the stolen information is rarely utilized immediately; instead, it is packaged and sold on illicit dark web marketplaces, leaving affected individuals exposed to recurring financial fraud and targeted phishing campaigns for years to come. Under Indiana state data protection laws and common law negligence principles, 166Buechel Stone had an affirmative, legally binding duty to implement reasonable security safeguards to protect the sensitive personal and financial data entrusted to it by its employees, contractors, and business partners. This legal obligation requires maintaining up-to-date encryption standards, performing routine network vulnerability assessments, enforcing multi-factor authentication, and promptly patching known software vulnerabilities. The occurrence of a successful network intrusion and subsequent data exfiltration strongly suggests a failure in these security protocols, potentially exposing the company to legal liability for negligence, breach of implied contract, and failure to provide timely and adequate notice under applicable state statutes. Receiving a formal data breach notification letter from 166Buechel Stone serves as a legal confirmation that your confidential information was compromised as a direct result of corporate network security failures, and it establishes the legal standing necessary to participate in a class action lawsuit. Affected individuals do not need to demonstrate actual financial loss or out-of-pocket theft to seek legal redress; the imminent risk of future identity theft and the forced burden of purchasing credit monitoring services are legally recognized injuries. Our firm is currently investigating potential legal claims on behalf of all impacted individuals on a strict contingency fee basis, meaning you pay absolutely nothing out of pocket and our attorneys are only compensated if we successfully recover financial compensation on your behalf.
You may have been affected by the 166Buechel Stone data breach if:
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
The hours spent responding to a data breach — canceling accounts, contacting credit bureaus, updating passwords, and investigating fraud — represent compensable economic harm in data breach litigation.
Once your SSN is exposed, protection becomes an ongoing expense. Plaintiffs in data breach settlements have recovered costs for credit freezes, identity protection subscriptions, and time spent dealing with fraudulent accounts — sometimes covering multiple years of exposure.
Fees charged to close and reopen accounts, issue replacement cards, or dispute fraudulent transactions are recoverable in data breach litigation. So are the costs of overdrafts, late payments, and credit damage caused by unauthorized activity.
Data breach victims regularly report anxiety, loss of sleep, and ongoing fear of identity theft. These non-economic harms are cognizable injuries in data breach litigation, particularly in cases involving SSN or medical record exposure.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Indiana data breach notification law, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
No. Under Indiana data breach notification law and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from 166Buechel Stone does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by 166Buechel Stone during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in IN. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
166Buechel Stone breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win