If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in CA. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the CA Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on November 26, 2025. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is September 2, 2025.
From the AG filing description
Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP is a professional services firm operating within the legal sector, specializing in complex litigation, corporate counseling, tax planning, estate administration, and sensitive advisory services. Because of the nature of modern legal practice, law firms like Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell accumulate an immense volume of deeply sensitive information. To effectively represent their clients and execute complex transactions, these firms routinely collect and store confidential client records, detailed financial statements, corporate governance documents, tax returns, proprietary business intelligence, and Personally Identifiable Information (PII) belonging to clients, opposing parties, and internal personnel alike. In 2025, Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP formally reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the California Attorney General, disclosing that unauthorized actors had gained access to their network environment. While investigations into law firm data breaches frequently point toward sophisticated phishing campaigns, compromised employee credentials, or vulnerabilities within third-party document management platforms and file-sharing utilities, the reality remains that legal institutions are prime targets for cybercriminals. Threat actors actively target law firms knowing they serve as central repositories for high-value data belonging to multiple corporate entities and high-net-worth individuals, making them lucrative targets for extortion, ransomware deployment, and corporate espionage. The exposure resulting from the Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell breach involves a hazardous convergence of sensitive records, which typically includes full names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, financial account details, tax documents, and confidential legal correspondence. The compromise of this specific data inflicts immediate and severe risks upon affected individuals. When Social Security numbers and financial details are leaked alongside legal and tax records, victims face an elevated, long-term threat of identity theft, unauthorized credit lines being opened in their names, tax refund fraud, and targeted financial spear-phishing campaigns. Furthermore, the exposure of confidential legal and corporate matters can jeopardize pending litigation, business mergers, and personal privacy. As a custodian of highly confidential and regulated information, Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP was bound by strict legal duties to safeguard the data entrusted to its care. Under California state data protection laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and statutory common law duties of confidentiality, the firm had an affirmative obligation to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures and practices appropriate to the nature of the personal information held. The occurrence of a successful breach compromising sensitive client and personnel files strongly indicates a failure in these mandatory cybersecurity protocols, potentially leaving the firm liable for statutory damages and negligence under state law. Receiving a data breach notification letter from Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP serves as formal legal confirmation that your confidential information was compromised due to inadequate data security measures. Under established legal principles, the receipt of this notice establishes legal standing to participate in a class action lawsuit aimed at holding the firm accountable. Affected individuals do not need to wait until they experience actual financial fraud to take legal action; the increased risk of identity theft alone is sufficient. Our firm is currently investigating potential claims against Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell on a contingency fee basis, meaning there is never any out-of-pocket cost to you unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), you may have a legal claim against Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state but typically run 2–4 years. Depending on when you learned of the breach, you may still have time. Contact our office for a free eligibility review — there is no cost to find out.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
Dubroff, Easley, & Lovell, LLP breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win