If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in TX. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Foley & Lardner LLP was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the TX Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on December 29, 2025. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is April 17, 2025.
From the AG filing description
Foley & Lardner LLP is a prominent, Am Law 100 international law firm providing sophisticated legal counsel to Fortune 500 corporations, high-net-worth individuals, emerging businesses, and major institutional clients across a wide range of industries including healthcare, finance, technology, and energy. Because of its elite status and involvement in high-stakes corporate transactions, intellectual property portfolio management, complex litigation, and regulatory compliance matters, the firm routinely collects, processes, and stores vast quantities of highly confidential information. This repository includes not only internal employee and administrative records but also sensitive client files, proprietary corporate strategies, merger and acquisition details, financial account data, and personally identifiable information belonging to adversaries, witnesses, and third parties involved in legal proceedings. In 2025, Foley & Lardner LLP reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the Texas Attorney General, thrusting the firm's data security practices into the spotlight. While the precise mechanics of the breach are still under active investigation, incidents affecting elite legal institutions typically involve sophisticated cyberattacks such as unauthorized access to network environments, ransomware deployments, or compromises of third-party vendor platforms utilized for document management and secure client communication. Law firms are prime targets for malicious threat actors precisely because they serve as centralized repositories for deeply sensitive corporate and personal data. A breach of this nature indicates that digital perimeter defenses may have been bypassed, potentially allowing unauthorized external parties to roam undetected within networks containing privileged and confidential materials. The exposure of data entrusted to a major law firm carries severe, multi-faceted risks for affected individuals. Depending on the scope of the incident, compromised files may contain full legal names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, financial account details, tax documents, and confidential communications. For individuals whose data is leaked, the fallout extends far beyond temporary inconvenience. The compromise of Social Security numbers and dates of birth provides cybercriminals with the foundational building blocks for identity theft, tax fraud, and unauthorized credit applications. Furthermore, when legal strategy, corporate trade secrets, or sensitive litigation documents are exposed, clients and affiliated parties face immediate threats of corporate espionage, financial extortion, and targeted social engineering schemes. As a custodian of sensitive personal and corporate data, Foley & Lardner LLP was bound by stringent legal and ethical obligations to implement and maintain robust administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. Under state data protection statutes, common law duties of confidentiality, and industry-standard security frameworks such as the FTC Act mandates against unfair and deceptive trade practices, the firm had a legal duty to encrypt data in transit and at rest, maintain active network monitoring, and swiftly patch known vulnerabilities. The occurrence of a data breach of this scale strongly suggests potential failures in these critical security protocols, raising serious questions regarding whether the firm met its legal standard of care in protecting vulnerable personal information. Receiving an official data breach notification letter from Foley & Lardner LLP serves as formal legal confirmation that your sensitive information was compromised as a result of the firm's security failure. Under modern data breach jurisprudence, the receipt of such a letter establishes the legal standing necessary to pursue a class action lawsuit and hold the organization accountable for failing to safeguard your data. Crucially, affected individuals do not need to wait until financial fraud or identity theft actually occurs to seek legal recourse; the increased and imminent risk of future harm is sufficient. Our law firm is investigating this breach on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are never any out-of-pocket costs or attorney fees unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Under the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, you may have a legal claim against Foley & Lardner LLP if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Phone numbers exposed in breaches are used for SIM swapping attacks — hijacking your number to bypass two-factor authentication on financial accounts.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Data breach victims regularly report anxiety, loss of sleep, and ongoing fear of identity theft. These non-economic harms are cognizable injuries in data breach litigation, particularly in cases involving SSN or medical record exposure.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state but typically run 2–4 years. Depending on when you learned of the breach, you may still have time. Contact our office for a free eligibility review — there is no cost to find out.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Foley & Lardner LLP does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Foley & Lardner LLP during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
Foley & Lardner LLP breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win