If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in OR. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the OR Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on January 30, 2026. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is October 23, 2025.
From the AG filing description
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP is a premier, internationally recognized elite law firm advising major corporations, financial institutions, private equity funds, and high-net-worth individuals on complex corporate transactions, litigation, restructuring, and regulatory matters. Because of the elite nature of its practice, Fried Frank routinely collects, processes, and stores an immense volume of highly confidential data. This repository includes sensitive client files, proprietary corporate strategies, M&A due diligence records, intellectual property, and extensive personally identifiable information belonging to partners, employees, opposing parties, and corporate executives. The firm serves as a central hub for confidential communications and transactional documentation, making it a high-value target for sophisticated cybercriminals seeking to exploit high-stakes commercial secrets and personal data. In 2026, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP reported a significant data security incident to the Oregon Attorney General, raising serious concerns regarding the safety of the sensitive material entrusted to its care. While law firm breaches frequently stem from advanced persistent threat actors, unauthorized access to legacy databases, or third-party vendor compromises, incidents of this scale typically involve external cybercriminals infiltrating network perimeters to exfiltrate confidential files. Given the nature of legal practice, attackers often target the systems housing corporate governance documents, personnel files, and client onboarding records, leveraging the inherent trust placed in legal service providers to harvest valuable personal and financial dossiers. The data compromised in the Fried Frank breach potentially includes a broad spectrum of highly sensitive categories, each carrying severe risks for affected individuals. Exposed information frequently encompasses full legal names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, home addresses, banking details, tax identification records, and privileged communications. For individuals whose data is compromised, the exposure of Social Security numbers and financial details creates an immediate and long-lasting risk of identity theft, fraudulent credit card applications, and unauthorized account takeovers. Furthermore, the leakage of confidential professional and transactional records can expose corporate officers and private clients to targeted financial fraud, spear-phishing campaigns, and corporate espionage. As a major legal services provider handling sensitive personal and corporate data, Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP is bound by stringent professional ethics, common-law duties of confidentiality, and statutory data protection frameworks, including state-level consumer protection acts and the Oregon Consumer Identity Theft Protection Act. These legal obligations require the firm to implement and maintain robust administrative, physical, and technical safeguards—such as multi-factor authentication, end-to-end encryption, network segmentation, and regular security audits—to protect stored data against unauthorized access. The occurrence of a successful breach strongly indicates potential failures in these security protocols, raising questions about whether the firm exercised the standard of care required to protect highly confidential consumer and employee data. Receiving a formal data breach notification letter from Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP is a legally significant event. It serves as an admission by the firm that your private information was compromised due to inadequate security measures, establishing the necessary legal standing to pursue a class action lawsuit. Under applicable state laws, affected individuals do not need to prove that they have already suffered actual financial loss or identity theft to participate in a legal claim; the mere exposure of your data creates a compensable injury rooted in increased risk and the necessary time and expense required for mitigation. Our firm is actively investigating potential claims on behalf of affected individuals. We handle these cases on a strict contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing out of pocket, and we only recover fees if we successfully secure a financial recovery on your behalf.
Under the Oregon Consumer Information Protection Act, you may have a legal claim against Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Data breach victims regularly report anxiety, loss of sleep, and ongoing fear of identity theft. These non-economic harms are cognizable injuries in data breach litigation, particularly in cases involving SSN or medical record exposure.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Oregon Consumer Information Protection Act and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Oregon Consumer Information Protection Act, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win