Just received a notice letter? Cases are filed first-come, first-served. You may be entitled to compensation.
Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the CA Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on March 28, 2025. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is July 19, 2024.
From the AG filing description
Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard is a prominent, full-service California law firm that provides comprehensive legal representation to public agencies, private corporations, and individuals across complex practice areas including municipal law, labor and employment, water law, and corporate litigation. Because of the nature of its sophisticated legal practice, the firm routinely collects, analyzes, and retains vast quantities of highly sensitive documentation. This includes confidential client communications, proprietary business strategies, internal corporate governance records, financial ledgers, and extensive personally identifiable information belonging to employees, opposing parties, and corporate clients alike. The centralization of such high-value information makes the firm a prime target for cybercriminals seeking to exploit confidential legal and corporate assets. In 2025, Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard formally reported a significant security incident to the California Attorney General, alerting affected individuals that their private information may have been compromised. While the full mechanics of the intrusion continue to be investigated, incidents of this nature targeting legal institutions typically involve sophisticated cyberattacks such as unauthorized network access, targeted ransomware deployment, or vulnerabilities within third-party vendor platforms. Law firms maintain vast digital archives containing years of sensitive case files and corporate disclosures, meaning that a single network perimeter breach can expose deep reservoirs of confidential data that adversaries can leverage for extortion, corporate espionage, or illicit monetization. The data compromised in legal sector breaches characteristically includes a dangerous amalgamation of sensitive personal and corporate identifiers, such as full legal names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, driver's license numbers, banking details, and confidential legal or employment records. When exposed, these data categories create severe, multi-faceted risks for victims. Social Security numbers and dates of birth form the permanent foundation for identity theft, allowing bad actors to open fraudulent credit lines, secure unauthorized loans, or intercept tax refunds. Furthermore, the exposure of employment, financial, and confidential legal documentation creates acute vulnerabilities for corporate account takeover, targeted phishing campaigns, and severe reputational or professional harm. As a professional services entity operating within California, Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard has a profound legal duty under state common law, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), and applicable professional responsibility frameworks to maintain robust, industry-standard cybersecurity protocols. These legal obligations mandate the implementation of rigorous encryption standards, multi-factor authentication, regular vulnerability assessments, and strict access controls to safeguard sensitive client and employee data. The occurrence of a successful data breach strongly indicates potential negligence or a failure in these administrative, physical, and technical safeguards, raising serious questions regarding whether the firm fulfilled its legal obligations to protect entrusted information. Receiving a data breach notification letter from Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard is formal confirmation that your private information was compromised due to institutional security failures, providing you with the legal standing necessary to participate in a class action lawsuit. Under California law, affected individuals do not need to prove that they have already suffered actual financial loss or identity theft to seek legal recourse and demand accountability; the mere exposure of your confidential data constitutes a compensable injury resulting from negligence. Our firm is actively investigating potential class action claims on behalf of all impacted individuals on a contingency fee basis, meaning there are never any out-of-pocket costs or fees unless we successfully recover compensation for you.
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
You may have been affected by the Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard data breach if:
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
No. Under California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state but typically run 2–4 years. Depending on when you learned of the breach, you may still have time. Contact our office for a free eligibility review — there is no cost to find out.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Received a notification letter from Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard?
Read our dedicated guide — what the letter means and what to do.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in CA. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Kronick Moskovitz Tiedemann & Girard breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win