Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the WA Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on September 3, 2026.
Data Exposed
Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the WA Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on September 3, 2026.
Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. is a professional services firm, operating as a law practice within the state of Washington. Law firms of this caliber routinely handle extensive, highly sensitive information on behalf of their clients, ranging from corporate governance records and proprietary business data to deeply personal client files, litigation documents, estate plans, and employment records. Because of the nature of legal representation, these organizations accumulate vast repositories of personally identifiable information (PII) and financial details. This makes law firms prime targets for cybercriminals seeking high-value data that can be weaponized for various forms of fraud. In 2026, Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. reported a data security incident to the Washington Attorney General, signaling a breach of the digital safeguards protecting their network infrastructure and document management systems. While the exact vector remains under investigation, cyberattacks targeting legal entities often involve sophisticated ransomware deployment, unauthorized access to legacy databases, credential harvesting, or vulnerabilities within third-party vendor platforms. Law firms maintain complex digital ecosystems where confidential communications and sensitive client files reside, increasing the attack surface available to malicious threat actors. The exposure resulting from this incident compromises multiple categories of sensitive information, creating severe risks for affected individuals. Exposed data types likely include full names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, financial account details, tax documents, and confidential legal or employment records. When compromised, Social Security numbers and dates of birth form the bedrock of identity theft, enabling threat actors to open fraudulent credit lines, secure unauthorized loans, or intercept government benefits. Furthermore, the leakage of financial and tax-related information exposes victims to immediate risks of tax fraud and direct account takeover, necessitating prolonged vigilance and financial remediation. Under Washington state law, as well as broader common law principles and professional standards, Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. had a stringent legal obligation to implement and maintain reasonable security measures to protect confidential client and employee data. This duty encompasses regular network monitoring, robust encryption standards, secure access controls, and comprehensive employee cybersecurity training. A data breach of this magnitude strongly suggests potential failures in these foundational security protocols, raising serious questions about whether the firm exercised the requisite standard of care in safeguarding the sensitive digital assets entrusted to its custody. Receiving a data breach notification letter from Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. is a formal acknowledgment that your private information was compromised due to inadequate corporate security. Legally, receipt of this letter establishes the foundational standing necessary to participate in a class action lawsuit seeking accountability, restitution, and enhanced data protection measures. Under modern legal standards, affected individuals do not need to prove that they have already suffered actual financial loss to pursue claims; the increased risk of future identity theft and the loss of privacy are actionable injuries in themselves. Our firm evaluates these cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing out of pocket and owe no legal fees unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Based on the data types reported, affected individuals face:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
What the Washington My Health MY Data Act and federal statutes entitle you to recover:
The hours spent responding to a data breach — canceling accounts, contacting credit bureaus, updating passwords, and investigating fraud — represent compensable economic harm in data breach litigation.
Once your SSN is exposed, protection becomes an ongoing expense. Plaintiffs in data breach settlements have recovered costs for credit freezes, identity protection subscriptions, and time spent dealing with fraudulent accounts — sometimes covering multiple years of exposure.
Fees charged to close and reopen accounts, issue replacement cards, or dispute fraudulent transactions are recoverable in data breach litigation. So are the costs of overdrafts, late payments, and credit damage caused by unauthorized activity.
Data breach victims regularly report anxiety, loss of sleep, and ongoing fear of identity theft. These non-economic harms are cognizable injuries in data breach litigation, particularly in cases involving SSN or medical record exposure.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Washington My Health MY Data Act and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Received a notification letter from Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S.?
What it means and what to do next.
Case review window ends October 29, 2026 — review your letter.
Review Your Letter →Mogren, Glessner & Ahrens, P.S. breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win