IN · AG Filing: Sep 24, 2026 · Recently disclosed — legal window is open
No cost. No obligation. If your data was exposed by Pena and Bromberg, you may be entitled to financial compensation.
Start Free Review →Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Pena and Bromberg was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the IN Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on September 24, 2026. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is May 7, 2026.
From the AG filing description
Pena and Bromberg operates as a specialized legal services and litigation firm, handling complex matters that require the collection, processing, and retention of highly confidential information. Law firms of this nature routinely gather extensive dossiers on opposing parties, corporate clients, witnesses, and employees, positioning themselves as custodians of vast amounts of sensitive personal, financial, and proprietary records. Because the legal industry relies heavily on digital case management systems, electronic discovery platforms, and secure client portals, these organizations maintain deep troves of data that make them high-value targets for malicious cyber actors seeking to exploit systemic vulnerabilities. In 2026, Pena and Bromberg formally reported a significant data security incident to the Indiana Attorney General, alerting regulators and affected individuals to an unauthorized breach of its network infrastructure. While investigations into legal sector breaches frequently point toward sophisticated cyberattacks—such as ransomware deployment, unauthorized access to legacy databases, or third-party vendor compromises—the core of the incident centers on a failure to maintain adequate perimeter defenses. Cybercriminals increasingly target law firms specifically to intercept confidential communications, legal strategy documents, and the deeply personal identifying data embedded within case files. The exposure resulting from the Pena and Bromberg breach involves sensitive categories of information that carry severe downstream risks for affected individuals. Exposed data types typically include full legal names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, confidential financial account details, and private legal correspondence containing sensitive personal histories. When Social Security numbers and personal identifiers are compromised, victims face an immediate and long-lasting threat of identity theft, fraudulent credit applications, and unauthorized tax filings. Furthermore, the compromise of confidential legal and financial documents opens individuals to targeted phishing campaigns, social engineering scams, and potential extortion. As a professional services entity entrusted with private data, Pena and Bromberg is bound by strict legal and professional obligations to safeguard the information in its possession. Under state data protection statutes, the common law duty of confidentiality, and regulatory frameworks governing data security, the firm was required to implement robust technical safeguards, such as multi-factor authentication, regular vulnerability assessments, and encrypted storage. The occurrence of a breach capable of extracting sensitive client and employee data strongly suggests a deviation from these standard security protocols, pointing toward actionable negligence in failing to protect confidential assets. Receiving an official data breach notification letter from Pena and Bromberg serves as a formal acknowledgment that your private information was compromised due to inadequate security measures. Legally, the receipt of this notice establishes standing to participate in a class action lawsuit aimed at holding the firm accountable for its data governance failures. Affected individuals are not required to demonstrate immediate financial loss or out-of-pocket expenses to seek legal recourse, as the increased risk of future identity theft constitutes a compensable injury. Our firm evaluates these cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
You may have been affected by the Pena and Bromberg data breach if:
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
The hours spent responding to a data breach — canceling accounts, contacting credit bureaus, updating passwords, and investigating fraud — represent compensable economic harm in data breach litigation.
Once your SSN is exposed, protection becomes an ongoing expense. Plaintiffs in data breach settlements have recovered costs for credit freezes, identity protection subscriptions, and time spent dealing with fraudulent accounts — sometimes covering multiple years of exposure.
Fees charged to close and reopen accounts, issue replacement cards, or dispute fraudulent transactions are recoverable in data breach litigation. So are the costs of overdrafts, late payments, and credit damage caused by unauthorized activity.
Data breach victims regularly report anxiety, loss of sleep, and ongoing fear of identity theft. These non-economic harms are cognizable injuries in data breach litigation, particularly in cases involving SSN or medical record exposure.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Indiana data breach notification law, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
No. Under Indiana data breach notification law and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Pena and Bromberg does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Pena and Bromberg during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in IN. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Case review window ends November 19, 2026 — review your letter.
Review Your Letter →Pena and Bromberg breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win