If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in TX. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the TX Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on October 2, 2026. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is September 3, 2026.
From the AG filing description
Pro Holdings, LLC, doing business as ProCamps, operates within the youth sports marketing and management sector, specializing in organizing and operating sports camps, clinics, and events featuring professional athletes. In the course of coordinating high-profile athletic camps across the country, ProCamps routinely collects, processes, and stores a vast amount of sensitive personal and financial data. This information typically includes the personal details of minor participants and their parents or legal guardians, such as legal names, dates of birth, residential addresses, contact information, and emergency medical details. Furthermore, because these programs involve registration fees, merchandise sales, and contractual partnerships with professional athletes and venues, the company maintains extensive financial accounts, credit card information, and corporate data, creating an expansive digital footprint that demands rigorous cybersecurity safeguards. In 2026, Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps reported a significant cybersecurity incident to the Texas Attorney General. While the full mechanics of the intrusion continue to be evaluated through ongoing forensic investigations, incidents of this nature within the youth marketing and event management industry typically stem from unauthorized access to enterprise databases, compromised administrative credentials, or vulnerabilities within third-party vendor platforms. Companies that aggregate consumer registrations and payment processing data frequently become targets for malicious actors seeking to exploit gaps in network perimeters, legacy software systems, or employee endpoints, resulting in unauthorized data exfiltration before detection. The data compromised in the ProCamps security incident encompasses categories of personally identifiable information that expose victims to severe, long-term risks. Exposed records frequently include full names, dates of birth, home addresses, email addresses, and phone numbers. In many instances, registrations for youth programs also involve sensitive payment card details, bank account information, and occasionally Social Security numbers or tax identification data belonging to parents, employees, or affiliated contractors. The exposure of this information creates an immediate and persistent danger of identity theft, financial fraud, unauthorized credit card charges, and targeted phishing schemes. When bad actors acquire a combination of minor participant details and adult guardian financials, they can successfully execute sophisticated social engineering attacks and fraudulent account openings that may go undetected for months. Under Texas law, as well as broader statutory and common-law principles, businesses operating within the state have an affirmative legal duty to implement and maintain reasonable security procedures to protect consumer and employee data from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure. The Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, alongside state consumer protection statutes, mandates that entities handling sensitive personal information must safeguard digital assets using industry-standard encryption, access controls, and regular security audits. The occurrence of a data breach of this scale strongly indicates potential failures in adhering to these statutory standards, suggesting that ProCamps may have failed to maintain adequate technical safeguards or prompt vulnerability monitoring protocols required to prevent unauthorized network intrusion. Receiving a data breach notification letter from Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps serves as formal legal confirmation that your confidential information was compromised due to corporate security shortcomings. Legally, the receipt of this notice establishes the foundation for affected individuals to participate in class action litigation against the company, asserting claims for negligence, breach of implied contract, and violations of state privacy laws. Crucially, under modern legal standards, victims do not need to prove that they have already suffered actual financial loss or identity theft to seek legal recourse; the mere increased risk of future harm and the loss of privacy are sufficient to establish legal standing. Our law firm is actively investigating this breach on a contingency fee basis, meaning affected individuals pay zero upfront costs or out-of-pocket expenses, and legal fees are recovered only if we successfully achieve a financial recovery on your behalf.
Under the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, you may have a legal claim against Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Phone numbers exposed in breaches are used for SIM swapping attacks — hijacking your number to bypass two-factor authentication on financial accounts.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
Case review window ends November 27, 2026 — review your letter.
Review Your Letter →Pro Holdings, LLC d/b/a ProCamps breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win