Just received a notice letter? Cases are filed first-come, first-served. You may be entitled to compensation.
SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the OR Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on December 30, 2025. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is not disclosed.
From the AG filing description
SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates operate within the specialized and highly regulated landscape of medical, diagnostic, and clinical laboratory testing services. Organizations of this nature serve as critical links between patients, treating physicians, and health insurance networks by processing, analyzing, and storing extensive volumes of highly sensitive biological, clinical, and administrative records. Because of the core operational functions they perform, SSL and ACL maintain vast digital repositories containing detailed patient histories, diagnostic results, demographic data, and billing information. This high concentration of confidential information makes them prime targets for malicious actors seeking to exploit valuable health data on the dark web. In 2025, SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates reported a significant data security incident to the Oregon Attorney General, raising serious concerns regarding the safety of the information entrusted to them. While details surrounding the exact technical vectors of the breach continue to emerge, incidents impacting clinical and diagnostic entities typically involve sophisticated cyberattacks such as unauthorized network intrusions, ransomware deployments, or compromises of third-party vendors integrated into the organization's digital infrastructure. These breaches often exploit vulnerabilities in legacy systems, inadequate network segmentation, or gaps in administrative monitoring, allowing unauthorized parties to bypass perimeter defenses and dwell undetected within internal systems for extended periods. The exposure resulting from the incident involving SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates threatens individuals with severe and multifaceted risks. Depending on the scope of the breach, compromised records commonly include full names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, health insurance details, medical record numbers, and clinical test results. The unauthorized disclosure of this specific combination of personal and protected health information creates an immediate danger of medical identity theft, where bad actors fraudulently bill insurers or obtain unauthorized treatments under a victim's name. Furthermore, when core identifiers like Social Security numbers and financial details are accessed, victims face long-term threats of traditional identity theft, fraudulent credit card applications, tax fraud, and unauthorized account takeovers. As a custodian of protected health and personal information, SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates were legally bound by stringent regulatory frameworks, including the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and state data protection statutes, to maintain robust administrative, physical, and technical safeguards. These legal obligations mandate continuous risk assessments, encryption of sensitive data both at rest and in transit, strict access controls, and timely patching of known software vulnerabilities. The occurrence of a data breach of this magnitude serves as a strong indication that the organization may have failed to implement or maintain these required security measures, thereby breaching its legal duty of care and statutory compliance mandates. For individuals who received an official data breach notification letter from SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates, this correspondence constitutes formal legal notice that their private information was compromised due to inadequate security practices. Legally, the receipt of this notice establishes standing to participate in class action litigation aimed at holding the company accountable for failing to safeguard sensitive data. Importantly, affected individuals do not need to demonstrate actual financial loss or out-of-pocket expenses to pursue legal remedies; the increased risk of future harm and the loss of privacy are sufficient grounds for action. Our law firm handles these complex data breach cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning affected class members pay absolutely nothing out of pocket, and there are no fees unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
You may have been affected by the SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates data breach if:
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
HIPAA violations carry civil penalties between $100 and $50,000 per violation. Where a healthcare organization's negligence led to the exposure of protected health information, class members may recover statutory damages in addition to actual losses.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Oregon Consumer Information Protection Act, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
No. Under Oregon Consumer Information Protection Act and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
If SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates is a covered healthcare entity or business associate under HIPAA, affected patients have additional rights — including the right to an HHS complaint. These HIPAA violations also strengthen civil damages claims. Consult an attorney to understand your full remedies.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state but typically run 2–4 years. Depending on when you learned of the breach, you may still have time. Contact our office for a free eligibility review — there is no cost to find out.
Accepting free credit monitoring from SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Received a notification letter from SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates?
Read our dedicated guide — what the letter means and what to do.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in OR. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
SSL and ACL and their current and former affiliates breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win