If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in IL. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
SSL AND ACL AND THEIR CURRENT AND FORMER AFFILIATES was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the IL Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on December 17, 2025.
From the AG filing description
SSL and ACL, along with their current and former affiliates, operate within the complex ecosystem of specialized professional services, human resources management, and administrative infrastructure, acting as central clearinghouses for highly confidential personnel, financial, and operational data. Because these entities routinely handle payroll processing, corporate administration, benefits coordination, and inter-company restructuring documentation, they amass vast repositories of sensitive personally identifiable information (PII) and confidential records concerning employees, contractors, and corporate clients. This concentration of high-value data makes these organizations attractive targets for malicious actors seeking to exploit systemic vulnerabilities for financial gain. In 2025, SSL and ACL reported a significant data security incident to the Illinois Attorney General, signaling a critical breakdown in their digital safeguards. In incidents of this nature, sophisticated cybercriminals often leverage advanced persistent threats, credential stuffing, or targeted ransomware deployments to breach corporate networks, gaining unauthorized access to legacy databases, cloud storage environments, or third-party vendor portals. Such breaches frequently go undetected for extended periods, allowing unauthorized parties to exfiltrate massive volumes of confidential records before security monitoring systems can effectively isolate and neutralize the threat. The exposure resulting from this security failure compromises a dangerous combination of foundational identity markers and financial records, including full names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, wage and compensation details, and banking information. The compromise of such intimate and structurally vital data creates immediate and long-term risks for affected individuals. Social Security numbers and dates of birth serve as permanent keys for identity thieves, enabling them to open fraudulent credit accounts, secure unauthorized loans, or intercept government benefits. Meanwhile, leaked financial and compensation records expose victims to targeted phishing schemes, tax fraud, and direct account takeover attempts, leaving individuals to shoulder the persistent burden of monitoring their financial identities. Under state and federal data protection frameworks, including the Illinois Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) and Section 5 of the Federal Trade Commission Act, entities like SSL and ACL have an affirmative legal obligation to implement and maintain reasonable, industry-standard administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect sensitive data. This duty includes regular vulnerability assessments, robust encryption standards, stringent access controls, and diligent vendor oversight. The occurrence of a widespread data breach strongly suggests a failure to uphold these statutory and common-law duties of care, indicating that systemic security gaps or delayed detection protocols permitted unauthorized actors to infiltrate networks that should have been rigorously defended. Receiving a data breach notification letter from SSL and ACL and their affiliates serves as official legal acknowledgment that your private information was compromised due to inadequate security measures. Under established legal precedents, the receipt of such a notice establishes concrete legal standing to participate in a class action lawsuit, even before direct financial fraud materializes. Affected individuals do not need to prove immediate monetary loss to seek legal recourse and demand institutional accountability. Our firm handles these complex data privacy cases on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay no upfront costs or out-of-pocket expenses, and we only collect a fee if we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Under the Illinois Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), you may have a legal claim against SSL AND ACL AND THEIR CURRENT AND FORMER AFFILIATES if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Illinois Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA) and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state but typically run 2–4 years. Depending on when you learned of the breach, you may still have time. Contact our office for a free eligibility review — there is no cost to find out.
Accepting free credit monitoring from SSL AND ACL AND THEIR CURRENT AND FORMER AFFILIATES does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by SSL AND ACL AND THEIR CURRENT AND FORMER AFFILIATES during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Illinois Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA), which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
SSL AND ACL AND THEIR CURRENT AND FORMER AFFILIATES breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win