If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in TX. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
Structural and Steel Products was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the TX Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on September 25, 2026. The breach or discovery date reported in the filing is January 24, 2026.
From the AG filing description
Structural and Steel Products operates as a heavy industrial manufacturer and critical infrastructure supplier, specializing in the fabrication of custom structural steel assemblies, highway and utility structures, and complex engineering components. Because of its deep integration into large-scale construction, industrial manufacturing, and public works projects, the company functions simultaneously as a major employer and a contractor handling sensitive corporate, logistical, and proprietary engineering data. To manage its extensive workforce, complex supply chains, multi-state operations, and compliance requirements, Structural and Steel Products routinely collects, processes, and stores vast quantities of confidential information. This includes detailed personnel files, extensive payroll and tax documents, proprietary vendor and subcontractor agreements, and corporate financial records necessary to sustain heavy manufacturing operations. The security incident reported by Structural and Steel Products to the Texas Attorney General in 2026 highlights the pervasive and severe cyber threats facing the industrial manufacturing and supply chain sectors. In incidents of this nature, unauthorized external actors or ransomware syndicates frequently target enterprise networks to exploit vulnerabilities in legacy IT infrastructure, unpatched remote access points, or third-party vendor connections. In the context of heavy manufacturing, a cyberattack typically involves the unauthorized exfiltration of internal databases containing deep organizational and human resources data. While investigations often focus on determining the precise entry point and dwell time of the threat actor, the immediate reality is that confidential corporate and employee archives have been compromised and exposed to malicious third parties. The data compromised in the Structural and Steel Products breach poses profound and enduring risks to every affected individual. Because manufacturing and supply chain firms maintain rigorous employment and payroll operations, exposed files commonly include full names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, home addresses, banking details for direct deposit, and comprehensive wage and tax information. The exposure of Social Security numbers and tax records creates an immediate and severe danger of identity theft, unauthorized credit openings, and fraudulent tax filings designed to intercept government refunds. Furthermore, the compromise of banking and direct deposit information leaves workers vulnerable to account takeover and unauthorized financial transactions, forcing victims to endure prolonged remediation efforts to secure their finances. As an enterprise operating and maintaining personnel records within Texas, Structural and Steel Products had stringent legal obligations under state data protection statutes, including the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, alongside common law duties of care. These legal frameworks mandate that organizations handling sensitive personally identifiable information implement and maintain robust administrative, physical, and technical safeguards to protect data from unauthorized access. The occurrence of a data breach of this magnitude serves as a strong indication that the company may have failed to adhere to these foundational security standards—potentially through inadequate network segmentation, delayed security patch deployment, or insufficient multi-factor authentication protocols—leaving vulnerable employee and corporate records exposed. Receiving an official data action notification letter from Structural and Steel Products is a formal acknowledgment that your private information was compromised due to corporate security failures, and it establishes the legal standing necessary to participate in a class action lawsuit. Affected individuals should understand that they do not need to wait for fraudulent activity or direct financial loss to occur before taking legal action; the compromise of sensitive data itself constitutes a concrete legal injury. Our firm is prepared to investigate the circumstances surrounding this breach and holds these corporations accountable on a contingency fee basis, meaning you pay nothing out of pocket and owe no legal fees unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Under the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, you may have a legal claim against Structural and Steel Products if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Data breach victims regularly report anxiety, loss of sleep, and ongoing fear of identity theft. These non-economic harms are cognizable injuries in data breach litigation, particularly in cases involving SSN or medical record exposure.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
State statutes of limitations for data breach claims typically run 2–4 years from the date of the breach or its discovery. Because this breach was recently disclosed, the window is open — but acting early preserves your options and strengthens the case.
Accepting free credit monitoring from Structural and Steel Products does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by Structural and Steel Products during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the Texas Identity Theft Enforcement and Protection Act, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
Case review window ends November 20, 2026 — review your letter.
Review Your Letter →Structural and Steel Products breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win