If you were affected, free legal review is available — no obligation.
Learn how to participate in the class action and what compensation you may be entitled to.
Join the Class Action →Use our verification tool to confirm your letter matches this official AG filing.
Verify My Notice LetterThis case file references a public filing made with the state filing in NH. This website is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or operated by any state government agency.
UFCW Local 135 was the subject of a data breach notification filed with the NH Attorney General. The AG filing was recorded on February 3, 2025.
From the AG filing description
UFCW Local 135 is a prominent labor union organization representing thousands of working men and women across various industries, including retail, food processing, meatpacking, and healthcare. Because labor unions function as the collective bargaining representative for their members, they collect, process, and maintain an immense volume of deeply sensitive personal, financial, and employment-related data. To effectively administer union contracts, process grievance claims, handle health and welfare fund enrollments, manage dues checkoffs, and provide representation, Local 135 must necessarily store comprehensive records containing confidential member information. This reliance on centralized administrative databases makes labor organizations prime targets for malicious actors seeking to exploit high-value personal credentials and sensitive workforce documentation. In 2025, UFCW Local 135 reported a significant data security incident to the New Hampshire Attorney General, alerting members and regulatory bodies that unauthorized actors had gained access to their network environment. Security incidents affecting labor unions and membership organizations typically involve sophisticated cyberattacks such as targeted ransomware deployments, credential harvesting, or unauthorized exfiltration from legacy databases and third-party vendor platforms. Once threat actors breach a union's perimeter, they often trawl through administrative systems containing decades of accumulated personnel files, dues-paying member rosters, and internal correspondence. Organizations of this type frequently manage disparate digital systems for member communications and benefits administration, creating potential vulnerabilities that malicious actors exploit to siphon sensitive files before security teams can detect the intrusion. The data compromised in the UFCW Local 135 security breach likely includes a comprehensive array of personally identifiable information and sensitive worker records. When data elements such as full legal names, dates of birth, Social Security numbers, home addresses, banking details, and wage histories are exposed, affected members face immediate and severe risks. The exposure of Social Security numbers and dates of birth provides cybercriminals with the foundational components necessary to execute identity theft, open fraudulent lines of credit, and file unauthorized tax returns in the victim's name. Furthermore, because labor unions frequently maintain records detailing employment history, grievance proceedings, and health benefit selections, victims face heightened risks of targeted phishing campaigns, social engineering attacks, and secondary financial fraud designed to siphon bank accounts and exploit union-administered benefits. As an organization entrusted with the sensitive records of hardworking individuals, UFCW Local 135 had a legal and fiduciary duty to implement robust, industry-standard cybersecurity measures to protect this information. Under state data protection statutes, common law negligence principles, and federal standards governing data stewardship, organizations maintaining private PII are required to utilize multi-factor authentication, robust encryption, continuous network monitoring, and regular vulnerability assessments. The occurrence of a successful network intrusion and subsequent data exfiltration strongly suggests potential systemic failures in these security protocols. Failing to maintain adequate digital defenses and failing to timely patch vulnerabilities leaves organizations legally liable for the foreseeable consequences of a cyberattack, including the severe administrative and financial burdens forced upon affected members. Receiving a formal data breach notification letter from UFCW Local 135 serves as a formal legal acknowledgment that your private, highly sensitive information was compromised due to inadequate data security safeguards. Under the law, this notification establishes the legal standing necessary to initiate and participate in a class action lawsuit aimed at holding the organization accountable for failing to safeguard your personal data. Importantly, affected individuals are not required to demonstrate immediate out-of-pocket financial loss to pursue legal relief; the increased risk of future identity theft and the time and expense required to monitor your credit are recognized legal harms. Our firm investigates and litigates these data privacy cases on a strict contingency fee basis, meaning you pay absolutely nothing out of pocket and owe no legal fees unless we successfully recover compensation on your behalf.
Under the New Hampshire data breach notification law, you may have a legal claim against UFCW Local 135 if any of the following apply:
Based on the data types reported in this filing:
Your SSN is the master key to your identity. Once exposed, criminals can open new lines of credit, take out loans, or file taxes in your name.
Combined with a name and other leaked data, date of birth helps criminals pass identity verification questions at banks and government agencies.
Common categories of compensation in data breach class actions
Courts recognize that the time spent monitoring accounts, placing credit freezes, and dealing with the aftermath of a breach has real economic value. This category of damages is recoverable even without direct financial loss.
Professional credit monitoring services cost $10–$40 per month. Identity theft restoration services, if needed, can cost hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars. Courts have awarded these costs as direct damages in SSN breach cases.
Direct financial losses resulting from the breach — unauthorized charges, fraudulent transfers, or fees incurred through fraud — are recoverable as compensatory damages. Banks may reverse some charges; a class action recovers the remainder and associated costs.
Several state data breach laws provide for statutory minimum damages — fixed amounts recoverable per affected individual regardless of actual loss. These provisions exist specifically to make legal action viable for victims who have not yet experienced direct harm.
Note: an attorney general breach filing does not by itself establish a settlement fund, a payment amount, or a claim deadline. If an official settlement notice is later issued, rely on that notice for payment details and deadlines.
No. Under New Hampshire data breach notification law and federal law, the unauthorized exposure of your personal data — regardless of whether it has been actively misused — can be sufficient grounds for a claim. The breach itself is the injury.
Nothing. The Law Office of David S. Harris handles data breach cases on contingency — you pay zero upfront and owe nothing unless compensation is recovered.
Immediately place a free credit freeze at all three bureaus (Equifax, Experian, TransUnion). A freeze blocks new accounts from being opened in your name. Then file a complaint with the FTC at IdentityTheft.gov and contact our office — SSN exposure is one of the most serious breach types.
Banks may reverse fraudulent charges, but they are not obligated to compensate you for time lost, stress, or indirect damages. A class action claim against the breached company can recover those additional categories of harm.
Statutes of limitations for data breach claims vary by state but typically run 2–4 years. Depending on when you learned of the breach, you may still have time. Contact our office for a free eligibility review — there is no cost to find out.
Accepting free credit monitoring from UFCW Local 135 does not waive your right to pursue legal action unless you signed a specific release waiving claims. In most cases, victims who accepted monitoring can still file.
Not necessarily. Many data breach victims are never notified directly. If your personal information was held by UFCW Local 135 during the relevant period, you may still qualify even without receiving a letter. A free eligibility review can confirm your status.
Applicable State Law
This breach was reported under the New Hampshire data breach notification law, which mandates notification and establishes your right to seek damages.
UFCW Local 135 breach?
Free case review · No fee unless you win